Selling compostable foodservice products comes with a liability risk. Most distributors don’t think about it until it’s too late.

 

If a product in your catalog carries a compostable claim that doesn’t hold up, you’re exposed. Not just the supplier who made the product. You, as the distributor who carried it, listed it, and sold it to your customers.

 

Regulators and plaintiffs have already named distributors directly in mislabeling cases. This guide breaks down what that liability looks like, where it comes from, and what you can do about it.

 

Why Distributors Are Getting Named in Mislabeling Cases

 

A lot of distributors assume that if a supplier provides the product and puts the label on it, the supplier owns the liability. That’s not how it works in practice.

 

When you list a product in your catalog, add it to your website, or sell it to a customer, you’re repeating that claim. And under Section 5 of the FTC Act, repeating a false claim makes you responsible for it, even if you didn’t create it.

 

The FTC made this clear in its 2013 ECM Biofilms enforcement action. Any party that helps spread a deceptive environmental claim can be held liable. That includes distributors.

 

The case record backs this up. California county district attorneys have built a consistent track record of naming sellers and distributors directly:

 

  • Walmart paid $1 million in 2017 for selling products mislabeled as biodegradable or compostable.
  • Amazon paid $1.5 million in 2018 to settle a California DA action over similar claims.
  • Costco paid $500,000 in the same enforcement wave.

Walmart’s public defense at the time was that it relied on supplier-provided labeling. That defense did not prevent the settlement.

 

So if a product in your catalog has a false compostable claim, you’re in the picture regardless of where that claim came from.

 

Attorney reviewing mislabeling laws and distributor liability regulations in legal documents at desk.

 

Types of Liability You Can Face

 

There are 3 main ways a mislabeled compostable product can create legal exposure for you as a distributor:

 

  • False advertising: If a product you sell makes a compostable claim that isn’t backed by evidence, you can be penalized under federal and state law. The FTC can fine you up to $53,088 per violation. California alone allows penalties of up to $2,500 per violation under its Unfair Competition Law.
  • Certification misuse: The BPI Certified Compostable mark is a registered federal trademark. If you list a product using that mark and the supplier’s certificate has expired or was never valid for that specific SKU, you’re distributing a fraudulent claim. BPI actively enforces this with cease-and-desist letters.
  • State law non-compliance: Each state has its own compostable labeling rules, and they go beyond what federal guidelines require. So even if you follow the FTC Green Guides, you can still be out of compliance in California, Washington, Colorado, New York, or any other state with active labeling laws.

Each of these can hit you independently. A single mislabeled SKU can trigger all three at once.

 

What the Law Looks Like State by State

 

You need to know which states have active compostable labeling laws, because selling into those markets without compliance is a direct regulatory risk.

 

California (AB 1201, AB 1276, SB 343)

 

California’s Public Resources Code §42357 is strict about what you can put on a label.

 

If you sell a product labeled “compostable,” “home compostable,” “biodegradable,” or “decomposable,” it must meet ASTM D6400 or D6868 standards, or you’re in violation.

 

By June 30, 2027, it must also qualify as a USDA National Organic Program-allowable input.

 

Products must also contain 100 parts per million or less of total organic fluorine. BPI or TÜV Austria certification is required. The Tyndall v. Sprouts case is built directly on this statute.

 

Washington (RCW 70A.455, effective January 1, 2024, enforcement July 1, 2024)

 

In Washington, you cannot use the terms “biodegradable,” “degradable,” or “decomposable” on any plastic product.

 

And if you label something “compostable,” it must carry a third-party certification logo and come in green, brown, or beige coloring.

 

Civil penalties reach up to $1,000 per day per violation after two notices from the Department of Ecology.

 

Colorado (SB 23-253, Compostables Labeling Act, effective July 1, 2024)

 

Colorado requires BPI certification specifically, with ASTM D6400 or D6868 as the underlying standard.

 

The same green tinting requirement applies. Penalties reach $500 for a second violation and $1,000 for a third or subsequent violation.

 

New York (ECL Part 351; GBL §§349, 350)

 

New York’s Attorney General can seek up to $5,000 per violation under GBL §350-d. New York State procurement specs now mandate BPI or equivalent certification for any compostable bioplastic products sold to state accounts.

 

If you distribute nationally, you need certification documentation that holds up in all four of these states simultaneously.

 

Person retrieving labeled documents from open filing cabinet drawer for distributor liability mislabeling records.

 

How to Vet a Compostable Claim Before Adding a Product to Your Catalog

 

Carrying a product with a false compostable claim is avoidable. The vetting process does not have to be complicated, but it does have to be deliberate.

 

Here’s what to verify before you list any product as compostable:

 

  1. Confirm third-party certification: BPI, TÜV Austria OK Compost INDUSTRIAL, TÜV Austria OK Compost HOME, and DIN CERTCO are the certifications that hold up under US state laws. ASTM D6400 or D6868 stated without a certifier name and certificate number is a red flag. “Certified to ASTM standards” is not certification.
  2. Cross-check the certificate number: BPI’s certified products database is publicly searchable. Look up the exact product SKU. A certificate for the brand or material type alone is not enough.
  3. Check expiration: Certifications are not permanent. BPI requires annual renewal and license maintenance. An expired certificate is a liability.
  4. Request a PFAS/total fluorine test result: This is non-negotiable for any product going into California. The threshold is 100 ppm or less, and the test result should be dated within the prior 12 months.
  5. Check state-specific color and marking requirements: Washington and Colorado require compostable plastic products to be tinted green, brown, or beige. Selling products without this coloring puts you in violation.
  6. Verify the claim matches the disposal context: Industrial composting and backyard composting are 2 different things. If your product is only certified for industrial composting, you cannot use home composting imagery in your marketing. The FTC also requires this label qualifier: “Conditions affect product breakdown. Access to composting may not exist in your area.”

If you want to skip this checklist entirely, the answer is to source from a local manufacturer that already has the documentation in order.

 

NantBioRenewables holds all three certifications that matter across US state and federal requirements (BPI, TÜV Austria, and USDA Biobased). Certifications vary by product SKU.

 

Its products are PFAS-free and manufactured domestically, which means shorter lead times, no overseas transit eating into shelf life, and a supplier who can back up every claim on the label.

 

To see the products before committing to adding a product to the catalog, email us at [email protected] to request a sample.

 

  

 

Supplier Contract Language That Actually Protects You

 

Most distributor-supplier agreements cover basics like pricing, delivery, and returns. What they usually don’t cover is what happens if a product turns out to have a false environmental claim on the label.

 

If that happens and your contract doesn’t address it, you absorb the cost. Legal defense, regulatory fines, customer refunds, and product withdrawal; all of it lands on you.

 

The way to protect yourself is to build compostable-specific language into your supplier agreement before you add any such product to your catalog.

 

These are the key provisions worth adding.

 

  • Put their claims in writing: Your agreement should require the supplier to formally confirm that the product holds a current, verifiable certification (BPI or TÜV Austria), tests at 100 ppm or less for total organic fluorine, and meets compostable labeling laws in every state you sell into.
  • Get notified immediately if anything changes: If your supplier loses a certification, gets a government inquiry, or fails a fluorine test, you need to know fast. Build a 5 to 10 business day notice window into the agreement.
  • Make the supplier cover your costs if their claim is wrong: Standard product liability indemnification won’t cover a greenwashing class action or a state penalty. You need language that specifically covers regulatory fines, legal defense costs, product withdrawal expenses, and any packaging redesign a court or regulator orders.
  • Build in annual audit rights: Once a year, you should be able to request the supplier’s certification documents, test reports, and PFAS data and actually expect to receive them. If a supplier pushes back on this, treat it as a red flag.
  • Require adequate insurance: Your supplier’s product liability policy should cover at least $2 million per occurrence and $5 million in aggregate. Make sure your company is named as an additional insured and that the policy covers environmental marketing claims.

 

Professional signing distributor liability mislabeling contract at wooden table with legal documents.

 

What to Keep on File

 

If a complaint or regulatory inquiry comes your way, your documentation is your first line of defense.

 

Keep the following on file for at least 7 years. That covers the longest statute of limitations across the key states and matches what the FTC expects.

 

  • Current certification documents with certificate numbers, downloaded and refreshed annually.
  • SKU-specific ASTM test reports (not generic resin-level reports).
  • PFAS/total fluorine test results, dated within the prior 12 months.
  • SDS sheets for any coatings, inks, or additives used in the product.
  • State compliance declarations (Washington requires a signed declaration from producers; Colorado requires producer registration; New York requires vendor statements for state accounts).
  • Internal marketing review records covering every catalog page, spec sheet, or website description that includes environmental language. Have 2 people approve each one, with at least 1 reviewer from legal or compliance.
  • Supplier correspondence showing what substantiation you requested and what you received.

Insurance Coverage and Where the Gaps Are

 

Most distributors assume their general liability policy has them covered if a mislabeling dispute comes up. It might. But there are gaps worth knowing about before you find out the hard way.

 

What Your Policies Likely Cover

 

There are 2 policies that typically come into play for greenwashing or mislabeling claims.

 

  • D&O (Directors and Officers): This covers your defense costs if a class action or government investigation targets your company over sustainability claims. Allianz Commercial has flagged greenwashing as one of the fastest-growing risks on the D&O liability agenda. If regulators come knocking, this is the policy you’ll lean on first.
  • CGL (Commercial General Liability): This may cover you if a sustainability seal is misused in a way that involves intellectual property. But most CGL policies need a physical harm to trigger (like PFAS in a compost stream). A false-advertising lawsuit often won’t qualify.

 

Where Your Coverage Probably Falls Short

 

This is the part most distributors don’t find out until a claim is already filed.

 

Anderson Kill has warned that pollution exclusions in some policies can make expected coverage disappear entirely when applied to environmental misrepresentation claims.

 

Other gaps to watch for:

 

  • Sustainability exclusions: Carriers are adding “environmental marketing” or “sustainability claims” exclusions to CGL renewals right now.
  • PFAS exclusions: Some carriers are extending pollution exclusions to cover PFAS-based class actions specifically.
  • Low sub-limits: Your advertising injury coverage sub-limit may not be nearly enough to fund a class action defense.
  • Prior knowledge exclusions: If you received a complaint about a SKU and kept selling it, your carrier may deny coverage on those grounds.

 

Person reviewing distributor liability documentation on clipboard at wooden desk with packaging materials.

 

Red Flags to Watch for in Supplier Claims

 

Not every compostable claim is backed by real testing. Here are the warning signs that should stop you before you add a product to your catalog:

 

  • Vague environmental language without a specific attribute: “Eco-friendly,” “earth-friendly,” “green,” “plant-based,” or “sustainable” without a defined, testable claim are precisely the terms the FTC has flagged since 1992 as unsubstantiated general benefit claims.
  • “Biodegradable” on a plastic product: This term is outright banned in California, Colorado, and Washington for plastic products.
  • “ASTM D6400 compliant” with no named certifier: Compliance with a standard is not certification. Anyone can write this.
  • A BPI logo with no certificate number: Verify on bpiworld.org. If it’s not listed, it’s not current.
  • “100% Compostable” claims: BPI explicitly advises against this language because it implies the product is suitable for home composting, which requires a separate certification (OK Compost HOME or equivalent).
  • Test reports more than 24 months old or covering a different product spec than what you are actually selling.
  • Overseas-only supplier with no US distributor of record and no listing in BPI or TÜV Austria’s public databases.
  • Marketing visuals showing a backyard composter when the product is only certified for industrial composting.

 

What to Do If You Find a Mislabeled Product in Your Catalog

 

Speed matters here. Acting fast and documenting your response is the difference between a manageable supplier dispute and a regulatory enforcement action named at your company.

 

  • Day 1: Block the SKU so it cannot be picked or shipped. Then contact your supplier in writing, flag the problem, and ask for current documentation.
  • Days 2 to 3: Bring in outside counsel and notify your insurance broker. Place a hold on all records tied to that product.
  • Week 1: If the problem is confirmed, pull the SKU from your catalog and website. Reach out to every customer who bought it in the past 12 months with return and refund options.

 

Contact the relevant state authority before the issue surfaces through a third party.

 

  • In California, that means CalRecycle and the DA’s office.
  • In Washington, the Department of Ecology.
  • In Colorado, CDPHE.

 

Voluntary disclosure has consistently functioned as a mitigating factor in California DA settlements.

 

Also, notify your D&O, CGL, and product liability carriers in writing as soon as the issue is confirmed. Late notice is one of the most commonly used coverage defenses by insurers.

 

Most importantly, designate a single spokesperson. Do not make public statements about relying on the supplier’s labeling without legal review first.

 

The Walmart precedent shows this argument did not prevent liability and attracted scrutiny.

 

Woman examining product packaging label carefully in kitchen, checking for distributor liability mislabeling warnings.

 

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

 

Here are a few questions distributors commonly raise about compostable product liability.

 

Does Home Compostable Mean the Same Thing as Industrially Compostable?

 

No. Industrial composting happens at high temperatures in commercial facilities. Home composting is a slower, lower-temperature process. A product certified for industrial composting will not break down in a backyard bin, and marketing it that way is a compliance violation.

 

Can I Get in Trouble for a Product I No Longer Sell?

 

Yes. Statutes of limitations run from the date of purchase. In California, that window stretches up to 4 years under the state’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL), so past sales can still come back to you.

 

Does Compostable Packaging Cost More Than Regular Packaging?

 

Compared to plastic, compostable packaging typically runs 10 to 40 percent more upfront. But the per-transaction cost can tell a different story.

 

Paper straws, for example, often end up costing more than compostable ones because customers need two or three per drink to get through it, while one compostable straw holds up for the full drink.

 

What Does PFAS Have to Do With Compostability?

 

PFAS are chemicals sometimes used in food-contact packaging to resist grease and moisture. California law bars any product with more than 100 ppm of total organic fluorine from carrying a compostable label, regardless of what certification it holds.

 

Protecting Your Catalog Starts With Who You Source From

 

Mislabeling liability is a supplier problem that becomes your problem the moment you list the product. The vetting steps, contract language, and documentation practices in this article give you a solid defense.

 

But the most reliable protection is sourcing from a manufacturer whose claims are already airtight.

 

NantBioRenewables manufactures its compostable foodservice products in the US, using Ocean Calcium Sand, a carbon-negative raw material that actually removes CO₂ during production.

 

Every product is built to certified compostability standards, so you can add it to your catalog with confidence.

 

Browse the full product range or request a sample below to see it firsthand.